E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuit accusing Trump of rape heads to closing arguments

Attorneys for the writer E. Jean Carroll and former President Donald Trump began on Monday to make their closing arguments, following seven days of testimony from witnesses for Carroll, who says Trump raped her decades ago.

Former president “Donald Trump has an M.O.,” and that is targeting women in “semi-public” places and “grabbing” their genitals, an attorney for Carroll said Monday during closing arguments in a civil defamation and battery trial.

Attorneys for Trump did not call any witnesses and he did not testify in the defamation and battery trial. 

Carroll says Trump assaulted and raped her in a New York City Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in the mid-1990s, and then defamed her when she went public with the accusation in 2019. Trump, who has claimed he never met Carroll and “she’s not my type,” has strenuously denied her accusations.

Those claims are at the center of Carroll’s defamation argument against Trump. The six men and three women who are on the jury watched the moment in Trump’s videotaped deposition when he was shown a late 1980s photo that included both him and Carroll, and he incorrectly identified Carroll as his ex-wife Marla Maples.

Carroll herself testified during the trial, relaying a detailed account of her accusation, which was first published in 2019 in New York magazine as an excerpt from her book, “What Do We Need Men For?: A Modest Proposal.” 

Carroll, then about 52, said she bumped into Trump, then about 50, while exiting the store one evening. She said Trump recognized her, saying “Hey, you’re that advice lady,” referring to a column she has written for nearly three decades. She said she replied, “Hey, you’re that real estate tycoon.”

Carroll said Trump told he wanted advice on a gift purchase for a girl. She described pleasant, “joshing” banter between the two as they walked through the store, even after he suggested they go to the lingerie department.

But things took a sudden turn when they went to a dressing room, she said. Carroll said Trump quickly shut the door and pushed her against the wall, her head slamming against it. She said Trump forcefully penetrated her with his hand, causing severe pain, and then penetrated her with his penis. Carroll said she was able to wedge her knee between them, pushing him away before leaving as fast as she could.

She described telling two other people about the alleged attack, in the moments and day after, friends Lisa Birnbach and Carol Martin. Both were called to testify during the trial, delivering testimony that largely matched Carroll’s recollection.

Other witnesses called by Carroll included a clinical psychologist, two former Bergdorf Goodman employees and two other women who described alleged attacks by Trump. Jurors also listened to an “Access Hollywood” clip in which Trump could be heard crudely describing grabbing women by their genitals.

Trump’s lawyers sought to pick apart the allegations brought forth by Carroll and the other women, Jessica Leeds and Natasha Stoynoff. Attorney Joe Tacopina zeroed in on Carroll’s inability to say conclusively exactly when, other than either late 1995 or early 1996, the alleged attack occurred, and noted that she did not identify Thursday as the likely day of the week the attack allegedly occurred until trial.

The jury heard testimony from a former Bergdorf’s manager who said in the 1990s the store was open late on Thursdays, though at times sparsely staffed — typically with few shoppers or attendants near the sixth floor lingerie department.

Jurors were shown emails and text messages between Carroll, Martin and Birnbach that appeared to show their animosity to Trump, who was then the president, as the defense tried to portray an effort by the trio to use Carroll’s story to tarnish him. 

Jurors are expected to begin deliberations as soon as Tuesday morning, deciding if Trump is liable for the alleged attack, and if he defamed her after she came forward.